ArticleCureus2024
Permanent Severe Visual Field Defect Following Pre-eclampsia and Multiple Ophthalmological Pathologies: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This clinical report discusses the interplay of various pathologies that may present similar clinical manifestations, with uncertainty about the distinct impact of each one of them. The patient is a 43-year-old young Asian female with no known medical conditions. She was 33 weeks pregnant when she was admitted for an urgent c-section because of preeclampsia with HELLP syndrome. While hospitalized, she complained about the visual field's loss. A comprehensive ophthalmological examination revealed a severe concentric visual field defect along with well-reduced visual acuity and impaired color vision. Her OCT revealed a bilateral serous macular detachment related to pre-eclampsia. A brain MRI revealed a microstroke at the temporo-parieto-occipital junction (TPO), although it did not fully account for the severity of the visual field deficit. Despite the macular pathology being resolved, the visual field remained deeply impacted. A thorough and complete investigation yielded negative results, leaving the cause of the patient's deficit unknown. The patient likely had a normal pressure glaucoma. Additionally, multifactorial bilateral microvascular ischemic neuropathy (caused especially by high myopia) has significantly affected her visual field. Furthermore, it is also probable that the patient had genetic neuropathy. Initial genetic testing was negative; however, due to the high suspicion of a genetic component, a retest was conducted, and the results were not conclusive. This case represents a highly unusual case of a profoundly affected visual field with no apparent identified cause. This is a notable example of the potential interaction of various local and systemic pathologies that can manifest with similar clinical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.