ReviewCureus2024
Biomarkers in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical utility of measuring circulating glial fibrillary acidic protein in severe stroke.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Review
- From Traumatic Brain Injury to Alzheimer's Disease: Multilevel Biomechanical, Neurovascular, and Molecular Mechanisms with Emerging Therapeutic Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Correlation between serum GFAP and 3-NT levels and the degree of neuronal injury in patients with glioma after surgery, and its diagnostic value.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship of S100 Proteins with Neuroinflammation.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- From Acute Injury to Chronic Neurodegeneration: Molecular Mechanisms Linking Secondary Brain Injury to Long-Term Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advances in Circulating Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Traumatic Brain Injuries, and Central Nervous System Tumors.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100B as Biomarkers of Ischemic Brain Injury During Surgery.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Utility of Serum Occludin as a Prognostic Biomarker of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Mediation Role of Acute Lung Injury: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Circulating Brain-Reactive Autoantibody Profiles in Military Breachers Exposed to Repetitive Occupational Blast.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Proteomic Changes of Neurodegenerative and Inflammatory Plasma Biomarkers Following Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotrauma reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) stands as a significant contributor to traumatic death and disability worldwide. In recent years, researchers have identified biomarkers to gauge useful outcomes in TBI patients. However, the enigma of timely sample collection to measure the biomarkers remains a controversial point in the case of TBI, unlike other degenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, where we can collect the sample at any point in time. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of biomarkers in TBI concerning time of injury by analyzing recent available data on biomarkers in the medical literature. A total of 2,256 studies were initially retrieved from the search engine. After an initial screening, only 1,750 unique articles remained. After excluding review articles, animal studies, meta-analysis, and studies with children (screened by title and abstract), 30 kinds of literature were found relevant to search the required variables. Further 16 studies were excluded due to the nonavailability of complete variables or data. Finally, 14 studies remained and were included in the analysis. This study has analyzed the four most commonly described biomarkers for TBI in the literature: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100 calcium-binding protein B, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1, and Tau. According to this statistical analysis, all biomarkers included in the study have shown their serum levels after trauma. So, all these biomarkers can be used for further study in the outcome prediction and diagnosis of TBI patients. The meta-analysis suggests that the best biomarker for TBI is Tau in cases where sample collection is done within 24 hours, while GFAP is the best biomarker to be studied for TBI if sample collection is done 24 hours after trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.