Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050190›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2024

Antibody Mediated Rejection and T-cell Mediated Rejection Molecular Signatures Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Kidney Transplant Biopsies.

Esteban Cortes Garcia, Alessia Giarraputo, Maud Racapé, Valentin Goutaudier, Cindy Ursule-Dufait, Pierre de la Grange, Lucie Adoux, Marc Raynaud, Clément Couderau, Fariza Mezine and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual inhibition of mTOR and calcineurin pathways mitigates missing self-induced NK cell-mediated microvascular rejection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Shedding Light on Microvascular Inflammation: Understanding Outcomes, But What Sparks the Flame?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Esteban Cortes GarciaUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Alessia GiarraputoUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Maud RacapéUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Valentin GoutaudierUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Cindy Ursule-DufaitUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Pierre de la GrangeGenoSplice, Paris, France.
Lucie AdouxUniversité Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), INSERM, Institut Cochin, Paris, France.
Marc RaynaudUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Clément CouderauUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Fariza MezineUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Jessie DagobertUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Oriol BestardDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc MoresoDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jean VillardTransplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Department of Diagnostic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fabian HalleckDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Magali GiralNantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France.
Sophie BrouardNantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France.
Richard DangerNantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France.
Pierre-Antoine GourraudNantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, Clinique des données, INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1413, Nantes, France.
Marion RabantDepartment of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Lionel CouziCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France.
Moglie Le QuintrecDepartment of Nephrology Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nassim KamarDepartment of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuel MorelonDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
François VrtovsnikDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Jean-Luc TaupinLaboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Renaud SnanoudjAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Christophe LegendreUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Dany AnglicheauUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carmen LefaucheurUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Alexandre LoupyUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Olivier AubertUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, interest in transcriptomic assessment of kidney biopsies has been growing. This study investigates the use of NGS to identify gene expression changes and analyse the pathways involved in rejection. An Illumina bulk RNA sequencing on the polyadenylated RNA of 770 kidney biopsies was conducted. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were determined for AMR and TCMR using DESeq2. Genes were segregated according to their previous descriptions in known panels (microarray or the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel) to obtain NGS-specific genes. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the Reactome and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) public repositories. The differential gene expression using NGS analysis identified 6,141 and 8,478 transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR. While most of the genes identified were included in the microarray and the B-HOT panels, NGS analysis identified 603 (9.8%) and 1,186 (14%) new specific genes. Pathways analysis showed that the B-HOT panel was associated with the main immunological processes involved during AMR and TCMR. The microarrays specifically integrated metabolic functions and cell cycle progression processes. Novel NGS-specific based transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR were discovered, which might represent a novel source of targets for drug designing and repurposing.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingKidney TransplantationT-LymphocytesAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeallograft rejectionkidney biopsieskidney transplantationmolecular signaturenext generation sequencingRNA-seq experiment

Identifiers

PMID39050190
PMCPMC11267505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.