ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2024
Analysis of major otosclerosis-associated variants in
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Otosclerosis (OTSC) is one of the most common causes of progressive adult-onset hearing loss in the Caucasian population, with a female preponderance. The etiology of OTSC is complex and there are a number of genetic variants reported to be associated with OTSC susceptibility, but no data on the genetic background of OTSC in patients originating from the central-eastern part of Europe have been available. The purpose of our study was to investigate in Polish patients the frequency of genetic variants previously reported to be most strongly associated with OTSC. Material and methods: Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples or buccal swabs. Variants in Results: For all of the tested variants the distributions of alleles and genotypes were not statistically significantly different between OTCS patients and the control group. There were also no statistically significant differences in relation to gender of the tested subjects. Conclusions: Despite multiple confirmatory studies on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.