Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050116›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024

Leveraging Narrative Feedback in Programmatic Assessment: The Potential of Automated Text Analysis to Support Coaching and Decision-Making in Programmatic Assessment.

Balakrishnan R Nair, Joyce M W Moonen-van Loon, Marion van Lierop, Marjan Govaerts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evidence-informed propositions for a whole-of-program assessment approach.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Balakrishnan R NairUniversity of Newcastle, Centre for Medical Professional Development, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9100-4298
Joyce M W Moonen-van LoonSchool of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8883-8822
Marion van LieropDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Marjan GovaertsSchool of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-0781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Current assessment approaches increasingly use narratives to support learning, coaching and high-stakes decision-making. Interpretation of narratives, however, can be challenging and time-consuming, potentially resulting in suboptimal or inadequate use of assessment data. Support for learners, coaches as well as decision-makers in the use and interpretation of these narratives therefore seems essential. Methods: We explored the utility of automated text analysis techniques to support interpretation of narrative assessment data, collected across 926 clinical assessments of 80 trainees, in an International Medical Graduates' licensing program in Australia. We employed topic modelling and sentiment analysis techniques to automatically identify predominant feedback themes as well as the sentiment polarity of feedback messages. We furthermore sought to examine the associations between feedback polarity, numerical performance scores, and overall judgments about task performance. Results: Topic modelling yielded three distinctive feedback themes: Medical Skills, Knowledge, and Communication & Professionalism. The volume of feedback varied across topics and clinical settings, but assessors used more words when providing feedback to trainees who did not meet competence standards. Although sentiment polarity and performance scores did not seem to correlate at the level of single assessments, findings showed a strong positive correlation between the average performance scores and the average algorithmically assigned sentiment polarity. Discussion: This study shows that use of automated text analysis techniques can pave the way for a more efficient, structured, and meaningful learning, coaching, and assessment experience for learners, coaches and decision-makers alike. When used appropriately, these techniques may facilitate more meaningful and in-depth conversations about assessment data, by supporting stakeholders in interpretation of large amounts of feedback. Future research is vital to fully unlock the potential of automated text analysis, to support meaningful integration into educational practices.

Indexed as

international medical graduateslearning analyticsnarrative feedbackprogrammatic assessmenttext mining

Identifiers

PMID39050116
PMCPMC11268569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.