ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2024
Efficacy and results of virtual nursing intervention for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Telenursing to Improve Quality of Life in Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- PanSupport: a community model of cancer supportive care provision.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Current and Future Directions Using Virtual Avenues for Care Delivery Across the Cancer Continuum.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Virtual Patient Education on Enhancing Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Students.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Virtual nursing interventions, which use virtual reality and artificial intelligence technology to provide remote care for patients, have become increasingly common in cancer treatment, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of virtual nursing interventions for cancer patients in contrast to conventional, in-person care. Methods: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) contrasted virtual nursing with conventional techniques that satisfied the inclusion criteria were found after a thorough search across databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and APA PsycINFO. RevMan 5.3 software was utilized for data analysis after the included literature's quality was assessed and the intended consequence indicators were extracted. Results: Virtual nurse interventions enhanced the quality of life of cancer patients (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.43, Conclusions: All things considered, virtual nursing shows potential as an adjunctive element of all-inclusive cancer care delivery models, deserving of further investigation and thoughtful incorporation into healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.