ReviewIndian dermatology online journal
Ultrasound Utility in the Management of Morphea: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Skin Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High-Frequency and Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound in Dermatologic Diseases and Aesthetic Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Morphea, an autoimmune progressive disorder, can significantly impact patient well-being, yet therapeutic options, though expanding, exhibit limited efficacy. A persistent challenge in disease management revolves around monitoring disease activity and gauging treatment effectiveness. To address this, various clinical assessment tools have been devised, each with its inherent limitations. The realm of imaging in morphea has undergone noteworthy expansion, with ultrasonography (US) emerging as an efficacious and cost-effective avenue for quantifying disease activity and evaluating therapeutic outcomes. However, the evidential support for its application remains equivocal. Our aim was to explore and analyze the existing evidence concerning the utility of ultrasound in the management of morphea. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review using PubMed Medline to assess evidence concerning US utility in morphea management. Results: Sixteen total studies were included in our review. Discussion: Although the studies presented carry their own limitations, cumulative findings indicate the potential of ultrasound, particularly when coupled with Doppler, in facilitating staging, assessing disease activity, and longitudinal assessment of therapeutic efficacy in patients with morphea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.