ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
Diagnostic Utility of Immunofluorescence on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Skin Biopsy.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When immunofluorescence on the frozen section is insufficient or unavailable, salvage immunofluorescence techniques can be used on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. The goal of the current investigation was to evaluate the diagnostic value of paraffin immunofluorescence following proteinase K digestion on skin biopsy samples in comparison to fresh frozen immunofluorescence. Materials and Methods: It was standardized and compared to the immunofluorescence on fresh frozen tissue (IF-Frozen) for paraffin immunofluorescence by proteinase K digestion of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin biopsies (IF-FFPE). The study included 50 native skin biopsy cases, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled IgA, IgG, IgM, and C3 intensity levels were evaluated in each case. Results: A total of 50 cases of native skin biopsy were included in the study, and their intensities for IgA, IgG, IgM, and C3 antibodies were compared. The average staining intensities in each disease group for the antibodies had equal intensity or had a minor difference (1+)/significant difference (2+). Paraffin immunofluorescence, proteinase K digestion had the best correlation, that is, had either equal or minor difference (1+) with fresh frozen immunofluorescence. The difference of 2+ intensity of antibodies between IF-FFPE and IF-Frozen was noted mainly in C3 antibody on paraneoplastic pemphigus. IF-FFPE showed a sensitivity of 100%, 97.6%, 100%, and 81.6% for IgA, IgG, IgM, and C3, respectively, whereas the specificity was 100% for IgA, IgG, IgM, and C3. Limitations: Small sample size and and the employment of one method of antigen retrieval in IF-FFPE. Conclusion: Immunofluorescence techniques done on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue can serve as salvage techniques in cases where immunofluorescence on the frozen section may not be adequate or may not be available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.