Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049992›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Automating surgical procedure extraction for society of surgeons adult cardiac surgery registry using pretrained language models.

Jaehyun Lee, Ishan Sharma, Nichole Arcaro, Eugene H Blackstone, A Marc Gillinov, Lars G Svensson, Tara Karamlou, David Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Specialized Use Cases.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaehyun LeeCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3085-8462
Ishan SharmaCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Nichole ArcaroCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Eugene H BlackstoneCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-3567
A Marc GillinovHeart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Lars G SvenssonHeart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Tara KaramlouCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
David ChenCardiovascular Outcomes Research and Registries, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-9180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Surgical registries play a crucial role in clinical knowledge discovery, hospital quality assurance, and quality improvement. However, maintaining a surgical registry requires significant monetary and human resources given the wide gamut of information abstracted from medical records ranging from patient co-morbidities to procedural details to post-operative outcomes. Although natural language processing (NLP) methods such as pretrained language models (PLMs) have promised automation of this process, there are yet substantial barriers to implementation. In particular, constant shifts in both underlying data and required registry content are hurdles to the application of NLP technologies. Materials and Methods: In our work, we evaluate the application of PLMs for automating the population of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STSs) adult cardiac surgery registry (ACS) procedural elements, for which we term Cardiovascular Surgery Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (CS-BERT). CS-BERT was validated across multiple satellite sites and versions of the STS-ACS registry. Results: CS-BERT performed well (F1 score of 0.8417 ± 0.1838) in common cardiac surgery procedures compared to models based on diagnosis codes (F1 score of 0.6130 ± 0.0010). The model also generalized well to satellite sites and across different versions of the STS-ACS registry. Discussion and Conclusions: This study provides evidence that PLMs can be used to extract the more common cardiac surgery procedure variables in the STS-ACS registry, potentially reducing need for expensive human annotation and wide scale dissemination. Further research is needed for rare procedural variables which suffer from both lack of data and variable documentation quality.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac surgeryclinical registriesnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39049992
PMCPMC11268872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.