ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.
Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Activity and Purkinje Cells: Mechanisms of Cerebellar Plasticity and Neuroprotection.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- A novel humanized mouse model exhibits neurobehavioral impairments and recapitulates key neuropathological features of infantile Tay-Sachs disease.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- PKCγ-mediated Phosphorylation of Mtss1 Regulates the Dendritic Outgrowth and Spine Development of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Cerebellum, Genes, and Pathways.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Homeostatic bidirectional plasticity in upbound and downbound micromodules in a model of the olivocerebellar loop.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Composite Behavior of Nanopore Array Large Memristors.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The investigation of the dynamics of Purkinje cell (PC) activity is crucial to unravel the role of the cerebellum in motor control, learning and cognitive processes. Within the cerebellar cortex (CC), these neurons receive all the incoming sensory and motor information, transform it and generate the entire cerebellar output. The relatively homogenous and repetitive structure of the CC, common to all vertebrate species, suggests a single computation mechanism shared across all PCs. While PC models have been developed since the 70's, a comprehensive review of contemporary models is currently lacking. Here, we provide an overview of PC models, ranging from the ones focused on single cell intracellular PC dynamics, through complex models which include synaptic and extrasynaptic inputs. We review how PC models can reproduce physiological activity of the neuron, including firing patterns, current and multistable dynamics, plateau potentials, calcium signaling, intrinsic and synaptic plasticity and input/output computations. We consider models focusing both on somatic and on dendritic computations. Our review provides a critical performance analysis of PC models with respect to known physiological data. We expect our synthesis to be useful in guiding future development of computational models that capture real-life PC dynamics in the context of cerebellar computations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.