ArticleOncology letters2024
Prognostic significance of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in locally advanced breast cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Exploratory evaluation of CA 15-3 × NLR score for predicting pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum amyloid A, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index with neoadjuvant therapy efficacy and prognosis in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic features and inflammatory status associated with tumor size in breast invasive ductal carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio as a subtype-specific biomarker in breast cancer prognosis: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Circulating chemokines and leukocytes and their impact on breast cancer prognosis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Neutrophil- and Endothelial Cell-Derived Extracellular Microvesicles Are Promising Putative Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to clarify the prognostic role of the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Due to conflicting results in currently available data, the specific focus of the present study was on evaluating the associations between the pre-treatment NLR and the rate of achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes. For the present study, data from a cohort of 465 consecutive patients with LABC who underwent NAC at King Feisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between 2005 and 2014 were obtained from a prospective BC database and analyzed. Patients were stratified into two groups based on an optimal NLR cut-off determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess variables associated with pCR, and Cox regression analyses were used to assess variables associated with survival outcomes. The low pre-treatment NLR group (≤2.2) was found to exhibit a higher likelihood of achieving a pCR (odds ratio, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.52-4.38; P<0.001), along with higher 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) [75.8 vs. 64.9%; hazard ratio (HR), 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94; P=0.02] and 5-year overall survival (OS; 90.3 vs. 81.9; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; P=0.04) rates compared with those in the high NLR group (>2.2). Sub-group analysis revealed that the observed significance in survival outcomes was driven by the triple-negative BC (TNBC) subgroup. Patients with residual TNBC disease and a high pre-treatment NLR were observed to have lower 5-year DFS (44.4 vs. 75.0%; P=0.02) and 5-year OS (55.9 vs. 84.5%; P=0.055) rates compared with those with residual TNBC disease and a low NLR. To conclude, data from the present study suggest that the pre-treatment NLR can serve as a viable independent prognostic factor for pCR following NAC in patients with LABC and for survival outcomes, particularly for patients with TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.