Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Technostress and time spent online. A cross-cultural comparison for teachers and students.

Ana-Maria Cazan, Laura Teodora David, Camelia Truța, Cătălin Ioan Maican, Ramona Henter, Laura Elena Năstasă, Niko Nummela, Olli Vesterinen, Arne Morten Rosnes, Tobias Tungland and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ana-Maria CazanFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Laura Teodora DavidFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Camelia TruțaFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Cătălin Ioan MaicanFaculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Ramona HenterFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Laura Elena NăstasăFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Niko NummelaRDI Department, Diaconia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli VesterinenSchool of Vocational Teacher Education, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Arne Morten RosnesSection for Teaching Support and Digital Development, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Tobias TunglandSection for Teaching Support and Digital Development, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Eirin GudevoldSection for Teaching Support and Digital Development, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Mari DigernesSection for Teaching Support and Digital Development, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Dagmar UnzFaculty of Applied Social Sciences, THWS Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefanie WitterFaculty of Applied Social Sciences, THWS Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg, Germany.
Mariela Pavalache-IlieFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research shows that ICT is beneficial for academics and students, aiding in overcoming distance barriers, streamlining administration, and improving teaching and learning processes. However, the negative impact of technology, particularly technostress, are garnering attention. In the context of the concerns about technostress among higher education institutions (HEI), the aim of the study is to analyze the technostress creators and inhibitors for university teachers and students in different European countries. The topical concept of digital well-being is seen as "a subjective individual experience of optimal balance between the benefits and drawbacks obtained from mobile connectivity, focusing on the personal perception of what amount of time spent using technology is optimal so that well-being is preserved". Method: To explore specific aspects related to use of technology, two - parallel online surveys for academics ( Results: The findings suggest that the perceived optimal use of technology is significantly lower than the actual use for all the contexts. Overuse of technology was associated with technostress. Our results also showed that technology self-efficacy and social support from colleagues and teachers are negatively associated with technostress. Country differences regarding technostress and time spent online were also observed. Discussions: Despite the needed caution in interpreting the results because of the unbalanced sample size across countries, the results could be used to develop research and support interventions within European countries to promote digital well-being, a better work-life balance with further positive effects on academic satisfaction and work/learning productivity.

Indexed as

optimal use of technologysocial supporttechnology self-efficacytechnostresstime spent online

Identifiers

PMID39049944
PMCPMC11267416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.