ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024
Manic Residual Symptoms Also Deserve Attention: A Symptom Network Analysis of Residual Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lots of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) continue to have residual symptoms after treatment in their remission, BD exhibits intricate characteristics and transformation patterns in its residual symptoms, residual symptoms of different polarities and degrees can mix with and transform to each other. There is a need for further investigation of BD as a comprehensive multivariate disease system. The current research lacks network analyses focusing on BD's residual and subsyndromal symptoms. Methods: 242 patients were included with bipolar disorder in remission. We compared demographic data and differences in symptoms between populations with and without residual symptoms using Results: Depressive residual symptoms (N=111) were more common than manic residual symptoms (n=29) in the patients included. The comparison between two groups with and without residual symptoms shows no difference in demographic data and medical history information. The main influencing factors related to residual symptoms were time from diagnosis to first treatment (OR=0.88), the first(OR=1.51) and second (OR=17.1)factors of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS)(OR=5.28), the psychological(OR=0.68) and environment (OR=1.53) subscale of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF). There was a significant difference in network structure between the groups with and without residual symptoms (network invariance difference=0.4, p =0.025). At the same time, there was no significant difference between the groups with and without depressive residual symptoms. However, the symptom network in patients with depressive residual symptoms is more loosely structured than in those without, with symptoms exhibiting weaker interconnections. When there is no depressive or manic residual symptom, it can still form a symptom network and cause an impact on social function. Conclusion: This study underscores the complexity of bipolar disorder's residual symptoms. Although it primarily manifests as loosely structured depressive residual symptoms, manic residual symptoms should not be ignored. Future research should explore network-based interventions targeting specific symptom clusters or connections to improve residual symptom management and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.