Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049918›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2024

Sourdough powder: physicochemical, microbiological properties and shelf-life stability in different package type.

Siti Hajar-Azhari, Bizura Hasida Mohd Roby, Siti Noorafiqah Jemain, Anis Shobirin Meor Hussin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siti Hajar-AzhariDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor Malaysia.
Bizura Hasida Mohd RobyDepartment of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor Malaysia.
Siti Noorafiqah JemainDepartment of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor Malaysia.
Anis Shobirin Meor HussinDepartment of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-8856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the culture condition of semi-liquid sourdough using Kombucha as a starter culture and to evaluate the physicochemical properties, microbial viability and recovering ability of sourdough powder when packaged in different types of packaging for 120 days. Optimal maturation time (103.47 h) and maximum leavening rate (1.27 mL/h) of sourdough were achieved at an incubation temperature of 34 °C and interval refreshment time at 7 h. The optimized culture was spray-dried using 3% Arabic gum (w/v) as a carrier agent yielding 35.86% powder with acceptable viability of 8.71 log CFU/g lactic acid bacteria and 9.03 CFU/g yeast. The sourdough powder was packed in four packaging (LDPE, vacuumed LDPE, aluminum foil laminated pouch and vacuumed aluminum foil laminated pouch) and exhibited comparable physicochemical properties during 120 days of storage. The viability of both lactic acid bacteria and yeast count in sourdough powder when packed in vacuumed aluminum foil laminated pouch showed higher stability for 90 days (6.18 log CFU/g and 6.82 log CFU/g) but reduced to below detection limit after 120 days (5.54 and 5.94 log CFU/g). This suggested that Kombucha sourdough powder packed in vacuumed aluminum laminated pouch could be stored for up to 90 days.

Indexed as

KombuchaPackagingPowderShelf-lifeSourdough

Identifiers

PMID39049918
PMCPMC11263515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.