ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2024
Advancing Evaluation of Microplastics Thresholds to Inform Water Treatment Needs and Risks.
Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Uptake and Elimination of Microplastics byEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Dietary rayon microfibers differentially reshape rearing water and host associated microbiomes of farmed European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax).Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- High-efficiency enzymatic biodegradation of polypropylene-based melt-blown fabric debris.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Exposure scenarios for human health risk assessment of nano- and microplastic particles.Microplastics and nanoplastics · 2025Review
- Development of "Threshold Microplastics Concentration" Concept and Framework in Drinking Water.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although human health impacts of microplastics are not well understood, concern regarding chemical contaminants retained on or within them is growing. Drinking water providers are increasingly asked about these risks, but strategies for evaluating them and the extent of treatment needed to manage them are currently lacking. Microplastics can potentially induce health effects if the concentration of contaminants adsorbed to them exceeds predetermined drinking water guidelines (e.g., Maximum Contaminant Levels). The risk posed by microplastics due to adsorbed contaminants is difficult to determine, but a worst-case scenario can be evaluated by using adsorption capacity. Here, a "Threshold Microplastics Concentration" (TMC) framework is developed to evaluate whether waterborne microplastic concentrations can potentially result in the intake of regulated contaminants on/in microplastics at levels of human health concern and identify treatment targets for managing associated health risk. Exceeding the TMC does not indicate an immediate health risk; it informs the need for detailed risk assessment or further treatment evaluation to ensure particle removal targets are achieved. Thus, the TMC concept and framework provide an updateable, science-based screening tool to determine if there is a need for detailed risk assessment or treatment modification due to waterborne microplastics in supplies used for potable water production.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.