Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Comparative Analysis of Heart Failure with Preserved Vs Reduced Ejection Fraction: Patient Characteristics, Outcomes, Mortality Prediction, and Machine Learning Model Development in the JoHFR.

Mahmoud Izraiq, Kais AlBalbissi, Raed Alawaisheh, Ahmad Toubasi, Yaman B Ahmed, Marah Mahmoud, Karam I Khraim, Mohammed Al-Ithawi, Obada Mohammad Mansour, Anoud Hamati and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Short-term outcomes of acute heart failure hospitalizations in Ethiopia: A multicenter prospective study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mahmoud IzraiqCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0003-5613-7428
Kais AlBalbissiCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Raed AlawaishehCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-2166
Ahmad ToubasiCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Yaman B AhmedCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Marah MahmoudCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Karam I KhraimCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0003-9567-1594
Mohammed Al-IthawiCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Obada Mohammad MansourCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Anoud HamatiCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Farah A KhraisatCardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-8941
Hadi Abu-HantashDepartment of Cardiology, Amman Surgical Hospital, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge affecting millions, with significant variations in patient characteristics and outcomes based on ejection fraction. This study aimed to differentiate between HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with respect to patient characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes, incorporating advanced machine learning models for mortality prediction. Methodology: The study included 1861 HF patients from 21 centers in Jordan, categorized into HFrEF (EF <40%) and HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) groups. Data were collected from 2021 to 2023, and machine learning models were employed for mortality prediction. Results: Among the participants, 29.7% had HFpEF and 70.3% HFrEF. Significant differences were noted in demographics and comorbidities, with a higher prevalence of males, younger age, smoking, and familial history of premature ASCVD in the HFrEF group. HFpEF patients were typically older, with higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Machine learning analysis, mainly using the Random Forest Classifier, demonstrated significant predictive capability for mortality with an accuracy of 0.9002 and an AUC of 0.7556. Other models, including Logistic Regression, SVM, and XGBoost, also showed promising results. Length of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation, and number of hospital admissions were the top predictors of mortality in our study. Conclusion: The study underscores the heterogeneity in patient profiles between HFrEF and HFpEF. Integrating machine learning models offers valuable insights into mortality risk prediction in HF patients, highlighting the potential of advanced analytics in improving patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart failureJordan heart failure registrymachine learningmortality predictionpatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39049833
PMCPMC11268376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.