Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049658›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2024

Accuracy evaluation of a universal dental implant guide for simulating implantation in posterior area on dental molds.

Ruibin Wang, Mingzhang Xu, Lan Wang, Ziyang Zheng, Yunyi Deng, Maoyun Zeng, Lingling Yuan, Peizhao Peng, Qiqi Liu, Ke Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruibin WangDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Mingzhang XuDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Lan WangDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Ziyang ZhengDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Yunyi DengDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Maoyun ZengDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Lingling YuanDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Peizhao PengDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Qiqi LiuDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Ke YuDept. of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to compare the accuracy of self-developed universal implant guide (SDG), 3D printed digital guide (DG), and free hand (FH) simulated implantation in the posterior tooth area of dental models.

methodsTen junior dentists were selected to place three implants in the 35, 37, and 46 tooth sites of the mandibular models (35, 36, 37, and 46 missing teeth) by using SDG, DG, and FH, and the process was repeated again to take the average value. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate the global coronal deviation, global apical deviation, depth deviation, and angular deviation between the actual position and preoperative planned position.

resultsThe coronal deviation and apical deviation of the three implant sites in the SDG group were not significantly different from those in the two other groups (

conclusionsThe precision of the self-developed universal dental implant guide can meet the requirements of clinical posterior implantation.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ImplantsMandibleModels, DentalHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalDental Implants3D printingdeviationdigital guideimplant guideuniversal guide

Identifiers

PMID39049658
PMCPMC11190869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.