Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049494›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

Nursing postgraduates learning experience of professional curriculum in China: A qualitative study.

Hongmei Jiang, Ting Zhang, Suofei Zhang, Huijuan Ma, Yu Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongmei JiangSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1213-8982
Ting ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Army Medical Center of PLA, Chongqing, China.
Suofei ZhangSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Huijuan MaSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yu LuoSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-3766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study adopted the qualitative research method, aiming to explore the learning experience of nursing graduate professional curricula in China from the perspective of students and provided a basis for the continuous improvement of nursing graduate training.

designA qualitative study.

methodsA purposive sampling method was employed to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 nursing master's students enrolled in professional curricula from September 03, 2021, to December 8, 2022. The Colaizzi seven-step analysis method was utilized for data analysis, summarization and extraction.

resultsFour themes emerged from the study findings: (i) The study of professional curricula is the cornerstone of scientific research work, but it is relatively boring; (ii) The teaching methods and assessment methods of postgraduate education need to be diversified; (iii) The postgraduate education needs to increase the study time of specialized courses and highlight the specialty characteristics; (iv) the study of professional curricula can enhance the comprehensive ability of postgraduate students.

conclusionThe study of professional curricula for post-graduate nursing students plays an important role in the development of post-graduate research and can statistically significant improve their comprehensive ability, but there are some problems such as boring courses, single teaching assessment methods and insufficient time. In the future teaching reform, it is necessary to highlight the specialty characteristics of nursing scientific research, optimize curriculum education and improve students' scientific research knowledge and thinking. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: We thank all participants for their valuable input throughout the study.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Nursing, GraduateQualitative ResearchStudents, NursingAdultChinaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLearningMaleeducationexperiencenursing postgraduatesprofessional curriculumqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID39049494
PMCPMC11269364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.