Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049464›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2025

Feasibility and usability of three consecutive nights with self-applied, home polysomnography.

Dimitri Ferretti, Anna S Islind, Kristín A Ólafsdóttir, Sigridur Sigurdardottir, Kamilla R Jóhannsdóttir, Jan Hedner, Ludger Grote, Erna Sif Arnardottir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dimitri FerrettiDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0009-0002-1749-904X
Anna S IslindReykjavik University Sleep Institute, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kristín A ÓlafsdóttirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sigridur SigurdardottirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-6327-8956
Kamilla R JóhannsdóttirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Jan HednerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7190-394X
Ludger GroteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7405-1682
Erna Sif ArnardottirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-3529

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 965417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-laboratory polysomnography, the gold-standard for diagnosing sleep disorders, is resource-demanding and not conducive to multiple night evaluations. Ambulatory polysomnography, especially when self-applied, could be a viable alternative. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of self-applied polysomnography over three consecutive nights in untrained participants, assessing: technical success rate; comparing sleep diagnostic variables from single and multiple nights; and evaluating participants' subjective experience. Data were collected from 78 participants (55.1% females) invited to test a self-applicable polysomnography device for three consecutive nights at home. The technical success rate for valid sleep recordings was 82.5% out of 234 planned study nights, with 87.2% of participants obtaining at least two valid nights. Misclassification of obstructive sleep apnea severity was higher in participants with mild OSA (21.4%) compared with those with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea or no obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset showed improvement from Night 1 to Night 3 (p < 0.001), and the mean polysomnography set-up time decreased significantly over this period. Participants reported moderate-to-high satisfaction with the device (System Usability Scale score 71.2 ± 12.4). The findings suggest that self-applied polysomnography is a feasible diagnostic method for untrained individuals at risk for sleep disorders, and that multiple night assessments can improve diagnostic precision for mild obstructive sleep apnea cases.

Indexed as

PolysomnographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsmultiple night sleep studyobstructive sleep apneaself‐applied polysomnography

Identifiers

PMID39049464
PMCPMC11911036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.