ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Feasibility and usability of three consecutive nights with self-applied, home polysomnography.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sleep and circadian health in the UK Biobank: report on the 2023 sleep questionnaire enhancement.Sleep · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of respiratory outcomes for a patch-based polysomnography system.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Hypoxic Load and Average Oxygen-Saturation During Sleep and Wake Are Associated With Cognitive Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Nursing Intervention Improves Polysomnography Success, Safety, and Patient Experience in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptance of self-applied home type-II PSG studies with a patch-based device.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Observational
- Bringing diagnostic home: models, challenges and enablers of home-based examinations imaging/graph services - a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Feasibility and usability of three consecutive nights with self-applied, home polysomnography.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Redefining telemedicine in obstructive sleep apnea management through artificial intelligence.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-laboratory polysomnography, the gold-standard for diagnosing sleep disorders, is resource-demanding and not conducive to multiple night evaluations. Ambulatory polysomnography, especially when self-applied, could be a viable alternative. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of self-applied polysomnography over three consecutive nights in untrained participants, assessing: technical success rate; comparing sleep diagnostic variables from single and multiple nights; and evaluating participants' subjective experience. Data were collected from 78 participants (55.1% females) invited to test a self-applicable polysomnography device for three consecutive nights at home. The technical success rate for valid sleep recordings was 82.5% out of 234 planned study nights, with 87.2% of participants obtaining at least two valid nights. Misclassification of obstructive sleep apnea severity was higher in participants with mild OSA (21.4%) compared with those with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea or no obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset showed improvement from Night 1 to Night 3 (p < 0.001), and the mean polysomnography set-up time decreased significantly over this period. Participants reported moderate-to-high satisfaction with the device (System Usability Scale score 71.2 ± 12.4). The findings suggest that self-applied polysomnography is a feasible diagnostic method for untrained individuals at risk for sleep disorders, and that multiple night assessments can improve diagnostic precision for mild obstructive sleep apnea cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.