Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049459›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2024

[Treatment Strategies for Gastric Cancer Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction].

Hyun Lim

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyun LimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-6420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer frequently leads to gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), causing significant symptoms and complications. Surgical bypass and stenting are two representative palliative treatments for GOO by gastric cancer. This study reviews clinical guidelines for malignant GOO treatment, highlighting differences in recommendations based on patient survival expectations and systemic health. A meta-analysis of surgical bypass and stenting in gastric cancer patients revealed no significant difference in technical and clinical success rates between the two treatments. However, stenting allowed faster resumption of oral intake and shorter hospital stays but had higher rates of major complications and reobstruction. Despite these differences, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Emerging techniques like EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy show promise but require further research and experienced practitioners. Ultimately, treatment should be tailored to patient preferences and the specific benefits and drawbacks of each method to improve quality of life and outcomes.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastric Outlet ObstructionStentsStomach NeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeGastric cancerGastric outlet obstructionStentsSurgical bypassTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID39049459
PMCPMC12285319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.