Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049123›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2024

Elucidating the nature of acinic cell carcinoma of the breast with high-grade morphology: evidence from case report.

Yunjie Ge, Xianping Wei, Jing-Nan Liu, Ping-Li Sun, Hongwen Gao

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunjie GeDepartment of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, China.
Xianping WeiDepartment of Clinical Research, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jing-Nan LiuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ping-Li SunDepartment of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, China. pinglisun@jlu.edu.cn.
Hongwen GaoDepartment of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, China.

Funding

Jilin Province Department of Science and Technology 20210101344JCJilin Province Key Laboratory 20170622006JC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast cancer. It was considered a low-grade triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the potential to progress or transform into a high-grade lesion because of the molecular similarities with conventional aggressive TNBC in several genetic studies. Microscopically, the coexistence of classical low-grade and high-grade triple-negative components in breast AciCC is not uncommon. However, there is a scarcity of research on the comparative histopathological and genetic aspects of both components. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old woman with a nontender mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast was initially diagnosed with a malignant small round cell tumor (undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma) based on a preoperative biopsy, which was later identified as breast AciCC with a high-grade solid component. Left breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Microscopically, the breast AciCC consisted of a classical acinic component and a high-grade component. The latter demonstrated a solid sheet-like pattern characterized by large, round, pleomorphic or vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitotic activities. Classical acinic architectures focally merged together to form solid nests and transited into high-grade areas. Remarkably, in the high-grade lesion, conventional immunochemical markers for breast AciCC, such as α1-antitrypsin (AAT), Lysozyme (LYS), Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), S100 protein (S100), and cytokeratin (CK) were negative, whereas cell cycle protein D1 (cyclin D1) and vimentin showed diffuse expression. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) revealed that 43.5% of variants were identical in both components. Furthermore, PAK5 mutation; copy number (CN) loss of CDH1, CHEK1, and MLH1; and CN gains of CDK6, HGF, and FOXP1 were identified in the high-grade lesion. The patient was treated with eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide) and radiotherapy after surgery, and she is currently alive for 43 months with no metastases or recurrences.

conclusionsThis case demonstrates a comparative analysis of the histopathological and genetic characteristics of classical low-grade and high-grade components of AciCC within the same breast. This information may serve as a morphological and molecular basis for further investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying high-grade lesions in breast AciCC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Acinar CellAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm GradingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorAcinic cell carcinomaHigh-grade morphologyHigh-grade transformationNext‑generation sequencingTriple-negative breast carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39049123
PMCPMC11267969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.