Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049092›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2024

Impacts of three inspiratory muscle training programs on inspiratory muscles strength and endurance among intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with difficult weaning: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Thomas Réginault, Roberto Martinez Alejos, Roxane Coueron, Jean-François Burle, Alexandre Boyer, Eric Frison, Frédéric Vargas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02855619 (Comparison of the Incidence of 3 Inspiratory Muscle Training Programs on Inspiratory Strength, on Difficult to Wean Patients in Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02855619 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Incidence of 3 Inspiratory Muscle Training Programs on Inspiratory Strength, on Difficult to Wean Patients in Intensive Care Unit: a Multi-centre Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2016 to 2020Enrolled92ConditionsWeaning From Mechanical VentilationArmsMartin, Cader, EDRIC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas RéginaultDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Bordeaux University Hospital and School of Medicine, Bordeaux, France. reginault.thomas@orange.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-8017
Roberto Martinez AlejosMontpellier University Training School of Physiotherapy, Montpellier, France.
Roxane CoueronDepartment of Clinical Research Methodology, Bordeaux University Hospital and School of Medicine, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-François BurleDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Lyon University Hospital and School of Medicine, Lyon, France.
Alexandre BoyerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Bordeaux University Hospital and School of Medicine, Bordeaux, France.
Eric FrisonDepartment of Clinical Research Methodology, Bordeaux University Hospital and School of Medicine, Bordeaux, France.
Frédéric VargasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Bordeaux University Hospital and School of Medicine, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

French health minister PHRIP 2015, n°15-0129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInspiratory muscle training (IMT) is well-established as a safe option for combating inspiratory muscles weakness in the intensive care setting. It could improve inspiratory muscle strength and decrease weaning duration but a lack of knowledge on the optimal training regimen raise to inconsistent results. We made the hypothesis that an innovative mixed intensity program for both endurance and strength improvement could be more effective. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled parallel trial comparing the impacts of three IMT protocols (low, high, and mixed intensity) on inspiratory muscle strength and endurance among difficult-to-wean patients.

methodsNinety-two patients were randomly assigned to three groups with different training programs, where each performed an IMT program twice daily, 7 days per week, from inclusion until successful extubation or 30 days. The primary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) increase. Secondary outcomes included peak pressure (Ppk) increase as an endurance marker, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, ICU length of stay, weaning success defined by a 2-day ventilator-free after extubation, reintubation rate and safety.

resultsMIP increases were 10.8 ± 11.9 cmH

conclusionsAmong difficult-to-wean patients receiving invasive MV, no statistically difference was observed in strength and endurance progression across three different IMT programs. IMT appears to be feasible in usual cares, but some serious adverse events such as bradycardia could motivate further research on the specific impact on cardiac system. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02855619. Registered 28 September 2014.

Indexed as

Inspiratory muscle trainingMechanical ventilationPhysiotherapyWeaning

Identifiers

PMID39049092
PMCPMC11271199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.