Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049078›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

What works in implementing shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes in primary care to enhance reach: a qualitative comparative analysis from the Invested in Diabetes study.

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Andrea Nederveld, Julia Reedy, Claude Rubinson, Bethany Matthews Kwan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03590041 (Invested in Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03590041 nacompletednot on this map

Invested in Diabetes: Comparing Patient-Centered Outcomes of Standardized Versus Patient-Driven Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments (PCORI IHS-1609-36322)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,085ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsStandardized SMA, Patient-driven SMA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sustaining Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments After a Pragmatic Trial.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jodi Summers HoltropDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Jodi.holtrop@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-4014
Dennis GurfinkelUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, ACCORDS, 1890 N Revere Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Andrea NederveldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Julia ReedyUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, ACCORDS, 1890 N Revere Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Claude RubinsonDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, 1 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77009, USA.
Bethany Matthews KwanUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, ACCORDS, 1890 N Revere Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-1609-36322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is a serious public health problem affecting 37.3 million Americans. Diabetes shared medical appointments (SMAs) are an effective strategy for providing diabetes self-management support and education in primary care. However, practices delivering SMAs experience implementation challenges. This analysis examined conditions associated with successful practice implementation of diabetes SMAs in the context of participation in a pragmatic trial.

methodsMixed methods study using qualitative and quantitative data collected from interviews, observations, surveys, and practice-reported data, guided by the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM). Data were analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Successful implementation was defined as meeting patient recruitment targets (Reach) during the study period. Participants were clinicians and staff members from 22 primary care practices in Colorado and Missouri, USA.

resultsThe first necessary condition identified from the QCA was the presence of additional resources for patients with diabetes in the practice. Within practices that had these additional resources, we found that a sufficiency condition was the presence of an effective key person to make things happen with the SMAs. A second QCA was conducted to determine conditions underlying the presence of the effective key person (often performing functions of an implementation champion), which revealed factors including low or managed employee turnover, a strong baseline practice culture, and previous experience delivering SMAs.

conclusionsIdentification of key factors necessary and sufficient for implementation of new care processes is important to enhance patient access to evidence-based interventions. This study suggests that practice features and resources have important implications for implementation of diabetes SMAs. There may be opportunities to support practices with SMA implementation by enabling the presence of skilled implementation champions.

trial registrationRegistered at clinicaltrials.gov under trial ID NCT03590041, registered on July 18, 2018.

Indexed as

DiabetesHealth care deliveryImplementation championsPrimary carePRISMQualitative comparative analysis

Identifiers

PMID39049078
PMCPMC11267890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.