Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049069›Full record

ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2024

The efficacy of custom-made offloading devices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention: a systematic review.

Aled Wyn Jones, Abraham Makanjuola, Nathan Bray, Yeliz Prior, Daniel Parker, Christopher Nester, Jinghua Tang, Liudi Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Benefits of Multi-Disciplinary Limb Preservation Teams.Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aled Wyn JonesAcademy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Abraham MakanjuolaAcademy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Nathan BrayAcademy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. n.bray@bangor.ac.uk.
Yeliz PriorCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Daniel ParkerCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Christopher NesterSchool of Allied Health Professions, University of Keele, Keele, UK.
Jinghua TangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Liudi JiangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR201315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTherapeutic offloading devices, including insoles, shoes, and other orthoses, are some of the most commonly used interventions to treat or prevent diabetic foot ulceration. Custom-made offloading devices are increasingly used to offset the development of foot ulcers. However, whether these devices are more effective than prefabricated standard offloading devices is uncertain. Therefore, this systematic review collates and examines evidence on the efficacy of custom-made offloading devices in preventing foot ulcer incidence and recurrence in people diagnosed with diabetes.

methodsFive scientific databases were searched, covering 2011-2023. Initial searches and screening were carried out independently by two researchers. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were further examined through additional screenings, and critical appraisal. Data relevant to the review aims were extracted and analysed within a narrative synthesis.

resultsOf the 1,715 articles found in the initial searches, nine papers were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The evidence shows that custom-made offloading devices are likely to be more effective for reducing or preventing diabetic foot ulcers than standard offloading devices. However, due to a lack of data it remains uncertain whether custom-made offloading devices are more cost-effective for preventing ulceration compared to standard insoles. Likewise, due to measurement heterogeneity between studies and lack of data, it is unclear whether adherence is higher in users of custom-made offloading devices, and whether such devices deliver significantly greater reductions in peak pressure as compared to standard offloading devices.

conclusionCustom-made offloading devices are more effective than standard devices for preventing diabetic foot ulceration, and we recommended their use when feasible; however, there remains uncertainty regarding their cost-effectiveness compared to standard insoles and offloading devices.

Indexed as

DiabetesFoot ulcerInsolesOffloading devicesOrthoticsPeripheral neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID39049069
PMCPMC11267867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.