Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39048996›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Factors predicting long-term outcomes following physiotherapy in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: a secondary analysis.

Thilo Oliver Kromer, Matthias Kohl, Caroline H G Bastiaenen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07536009 ("Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07536009 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

"Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2026 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsSubacromial Impingement SyndromeArmsDigital Physical Therapy (Telerehabilitation), Conventional Physical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thilo Oliver KromerFaculty of Health, Safety, Society, Furtwangen University, Study Center Freiburg, Konrad-Goldmann-Straße 7, 79100, Freiburg, Germany. thilo.kromer@hs-furtwangen.de.
Matthias KohlFaculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Precision Medicine, Campus Villingen- Schwenningen, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany.
Caroline H G BastiaenenCaphri Research Institute, Research line Functioning & Rehabilitation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough patients with shoulder complaints are frequently referred to physiotherapy, putative predictive factors for outcomes are still unclear. In this regard, only a limited amount of scientific data for patients with subacromial pain syndrome exist, with inconsistent results. An improved knowledge about the ability of baseline variables to predict outcomes could help patients make informed treatment decisions, prevent them from receiving ineffective treatments, and minimize the risk of developing chronic pain.

aimThe aims of this secondary longitudinal analysis are threefold: First, to investigate baseline differences between patients with and without successful long-term outcomes following physiotherapy. Second, to compare the predictive ability of two sets of putative predictive variables on outcomes, one based on the literature and one based on the data of the original trial. Third, to explore the contribution of short-term follow-up data to predictive models.

methodsDifferences between responders and nonresponders were calculated. The predictive ability of variables defined through literature and of variables based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) from the original trial dataset on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Patients' Global Impression of Change at the one-year follow-up were analyzed. To test the robustness of the results, different statistical models were used. To investigate the contribution of follow-up data to prediction, short-term data were included in the analyses.

resultsA sample of 87 patients with subacromial pain syndrome was analyzed. 77% (n = 67) of these participants were classified as responders. Higher expectations and short-term change scores were positive, and higher fear avoidance beliefs, greater baseline disability and pain levels were negative predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

conclusionsAlthough our results are in line with previous research and support the use of clinical factors for prediction, our findings suggest that psychological factors, especially patient expectations and fear avoidance beliefs, also contribute to long-term outcomes and should therefore be considered in the clinical context and further research. However, the hypotheses and recommendations generated from our results need to be confirmed in further studies due to their explorative nature.

trial registrationThe original trial was registered at Current Controlled Trials under the trial registration number ISRCTN86900354 on March 17, 2010.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesShoulder Impingement SyndromeAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPredictive Value of TestsShoulder PainTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeClinical decision rulesPhysical therapy modalitiesRehabilitationShoulder impingement syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39048996
PMCPMC11267964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.