ArticleBMC genomics2024
Genomic analysis reveals the association of KIT and MITF variants with the white spotting in swamp buffaloes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Untangling the Copy Number Variation at the Basis of Belted Phenotypes in Cattle Using Long-Read Sequencing.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- Research note: Pool sequencing nominates MITF as a key candidate gene for white-belted feathers in chickens.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Beyond black and white: dissecting the genetic basis of skin depigmentation in Nellore cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Comparative Single-Cell Transcriptomic Landscape Reveals the Regulatory Mechanisms of Lactation during Selective Breeding in Asian Water Buffalo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association study of genetic markers of coat color patterns in Sumatran native cattle.Veterinary world · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSwamp-type buffaloes with varying degrees of white spotting are found exclusively in Tana Toraja, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, where spotted buffalo bulls are highly valued in accordance with the Torajan customs. The white spotting depigmentation is caused by the absence of melanocytes. However, the genetic variants that cause this phenotype have not been fully characterized. The objective of this study was to identify the genomic regions and variants responsible for this unique coat-color pattern.
resultsGenome-wide association study (GWAS) and selection signature analysis identified MITF as a key gene based on the whole-genome sequencing data of 28 solid and 39 spotted buffaloes, while KIT was also found to be involved in the development of this phenotype by a candidate gene approach. Alternative candidate mutations included, in addition to the previously reported nonsense mutation c.649 C > T (p.Arg217*) and splice donor mutation c.1179 + 2T > A in MITF, a nonsense mutation c.2028T > A (p.Tyr676*) in KIT. All these three mutations were located in the genomic regions that were highly conserved exclusively in Indonesian swamp buffaloes and they accounted largely (95%) for the manifestation of white spotting. Last but not the least, ADAMTS20 and TWIST2 may also contribute to the diversification of this coat-color pattern.
conclusionsThe alternative mutations identified in this study affect, at least partially and independently, the development of melanocytes. The presence and persistence of such mutations may be explained by significant financial and social value of spotted buffaloes used in historical Rambu Solo ceremony in Tana Toraja, Indonesia. Several de novo spontaneous mutations have therefore been favored by traditional breeding for the spotted buffaloes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.