ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
RadImageNet and ImageNet as Datasets for Transfer Learning in the Assessment of Dental Radiographs: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confounder-Matched Deep Learning on Cardiac CT for the Diagnosis of Tetralogy of Fallot: A Proof of Concept.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RDE-DR: robust deep ensemble CNNs for automated diabetic retinopathy detection from fundus images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-scale deep learning models based on MRI for predicting pathological differentiation and evaluating its association with recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: an explainable machine learning study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Detection of Valve Vegetations in Native and Prosthetic Valves using Echocardiographic Radiomics and Deep Learning on Transesophageal Echocardiography Images.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Radiomics Model Based on Computed Tomography Image for Predicting the Classification of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Integrating Super-Resolution with Deep Learning for Enhanced Periodontal Bone Loss Segmentation in Panoramic Radiographs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfer learning (TL) is an alternative approach to the full training of deep learning (DL) models from scratch and can transfer knowledge gained from large-scale data to solve different problems. ImageNet, which is a publicly available large-scale dataset, is a commonly used dataset for TL-based image analysis; many studies have applied pre-trained models from ImageNet to clinical prediction tasks and have reported promising results. However, some have questioned the effectiveness of using ImageNet, which consists solely of natural images, for medical image analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre-trained models using RadImageNet, which is a large-scale medical image dataset, could achieve superior performance in classification tasks in dental imaging modalities compared with ImageNet pre-trained models. To evaluate the classification performance of RadImageNet and ImageNet pre-trained models for TL, two dental imaging datasets were used. The tasks were (1) classifying the presence or absence of supernumerary teeth from a dataset of panoramic radiographs and (2) classifying sex from a dataset of lateral cephalometric radiographs. Performance was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve (AUC). On the panoramic radiograph dataset, the RadImageNet models gave average AUCs of 0.68 ± 0.15 (p < 0.01), and the ImageNet models had values of 0.74 ± 0.19. In contrast, on the lateral cephalometric dataset, the RadImageNet models demonstrated average AUCs of 0.76 ± 0.09, and the ImageNet models achieved values of 0.75 ± 0.17. The difference in performance between RadImageNet and ImageNet models in TL depends on the dental image dataset used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.