Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39048757›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Voice quality after open partial horizontal laryngectomy vs. total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis: a comparative study.

Cecilia Botti, Cecilia Lotto, Paolo Tesauro, Monica Guidotti, Aurora Borghi, Gabriele Molteni, Livio Presutti, Ignacio Javier Fernandez

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cecilia BottiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cecilia LottoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo TesauroDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. paolo.tesauro@studio.unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3347-4347
Monica GuidottiSpeech Language Therapist in Otolaryngology and Audiology Unit, Department of Head and Neck Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Aurora BorghiSpeech Language Therapist in Otolaryngology and Audiology Unit, Department of Head and Neck Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gabriele MolteniDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Livio PresuttiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ignacio Javier FernandezDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare voice outcomes in open partial horizontal laryngectomy vs. total laryngectomy (TL) with voice prosthesis.

methodsIn this retrospective monocentric study patients undergoing OPHL or TL with voice prosthesis were enrolled during the usual oncological follow-up consultations at the Otolaryngology and Audiology Unit of a University Hospital in the period between July 2022 and June 2023. Acoustic analysis (F0, HNR, NHR), maximum phonation time, I-SECEL and INFV0 scale were used to assess voice outcome.

resultsForty-three patients were enrolled. Voices of patients undergoing LT were better in quality of voice (V0) at INFV0 scale. The scores in I-SECEL and acoustic analysis were comparable.

conclusionsVoice quality could be slight better in patients undergoing TL with voice prosthesis than those undergoing OPHL.

Indexed as

Laryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyLarynx, ArtificialVoice QualityAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesOPHLTotal laryngectomyVoice prosthesisVoice quality

Identifiers

PMID39048757
PMCPMC11393102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.