Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39048729›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

Ecological dynamics of moa extinctions reveal convergent refugia that today harbour flightless birds.

Sean Tomlinson, Mark V Lomolino, Jamie R Wood, Atholl Anderson, Stuart C Brown, Sean Haythorne, George L W Perry, Janet M Wilmshurst, Jeremy J Austin, Damien A Fordham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sean TomlinsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. sean.tomlinson@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-5391
Mark V LomolinoCollege of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-4762
Jamie R WoodSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-6083
Atholl AndersonSchool of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Stuart C BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-1418
Sean HaythorneCentre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4550-1489
George L W PerrySchool of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9672-9135
Janet M WilmshurstEcosystems & Conservation, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4474-8569
Jeremy J AustinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Damien A FordhamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. damien.fordham@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-5592

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP180102392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human settlement of islands across the Pacific Ocean was followed by waves of faunal extinctions that occurred so rapidly that their dynamics are difficult to reconstruct in space and time. These extinctions included large, wingless birds called moa that were endemic to New Zealand. Here we reconstructed the range and extinction dynamics of six genetically distinct species of moa across New Zealand at a fine spatiotemporal resolution, using hundreds of thousands of process-explicit simulations of climate-human-moa interactions, which were validated against inferences of occurrence and range contraction from an extensive fossil record. These process-based simulations revealed important interspecific differences in the ecological and demographic attributes of moa and established how these differences influenced likely trajectories of geographic and demographic declines of moa following Polynesian colonization of New Zealand. We show that despite these interspecific differences in extinction dynamics, the spatial patterns of geographic range collapse of moa species were probably similar. It is most likely that the final populations of all moa species persisted in suboptimal habitats in cold, mountainous areas that were generally last and least impacted by people. We find that these refugia for the last populations of moa continue to serve as isolated sanctuaries for New Zealand's remaining flightless birds, providing fresh insights for conserving endemic species in the face of current and future threats.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalAnimal DistributionAnimalsBirdsEcosystemNew ZealandPopulation DynamicsRefugium

Identifiers

PMID39048729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.