ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Explainable AI decision support improves accuracy during telehealth strep throat screening.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multioutput Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes After Liposuction: Algorithm Development and Validation Study in a Multicenter Cohort.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Human-AI Collaboration in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making in medicine: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration.iScience · 2026Review
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Automation Bias, Deskilling, and Cognitive Implications - A Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Advancing throat cancer detection using an iterative multimodal machine learning approach for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Medicine: A Scoping Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Human-centered explainability evaluation in clinical decision-making: a critical review of the literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Review
- An Intrinsically Explainable Approach to Detecting Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans via Neurosymbolic Modeling.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Perceptions and future perspectives of medical students on the use of artificial intelligence based chatbots: an exploratory analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence-based (AI) clinical decision support systems (CDSS) using unconventional data, like smartphone-acquired images, promise transformational opportunities for telehealth; including remote diagnosis. Although such solutions' potential remains largely untapped, providers' trust and understanding are vital for effective adoption. This study examines how different human-AI interaction paradigms affect clinicians' responses to an emerging AI CDSS for streptococcal pharyngitis (strep throat) detection from smartphone throat images.
methodsIn a randomized experiment, we tested explainable AI strategies using three AI-based CDSS prototypes for strep throat prediction. Participants received clinical vignettes via an online survey to predict the disease state and offer clinical recommendations. The first set included a validated CDSS prediction (Modified Centor Score) and the second introduced an explainable AI prototype randomly. We used linear models to assess explainable AI's effect on clinicians' accuracy, confirmatory testing rates, and perceived trust and understanding of the CDSS.
resultsThe study, involving 121 telehealth providers, shows that compared to using the Centor Score, AI-based CDSS can improve clinicians' predictions. Despite higher agreement with AI, participants report lower trust in its advice than in the Centor Score, leading to more requests for in-person confirmatory testing.
conclusionsEffectively integrating AI is crucial in the telehealth-based diagnosis of infectious diseases, given the implications of antibiotic over-prescriptions. We demonstrate that AI-based CDSS can improve the accuracy of remote strep throat screening yet underscores the necessity to enhance human-machine collaboration, particularly in trust and intelligibility. This ensures providers and patients can capitalize on AI interventions and smartphones for virtual healthcare.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.