Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39048661›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing the predictive capability of N, P, and B diagnosis in cotton crop.

Edilaine Istéfani Franklin Traspadini, Paulo Guilherme Salvador Wadt, Renato Mello de Prado, Douglas Furtado Oliveira, Cid Naudi Silva Campos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Foliar nutrient diagnosis inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edilaine Istéfani Franklin TraspadiniUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brasil. edilainetraspadini@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8209-4212
Paulo Guilherme Salvador WadtEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Porto Velho, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-6308
Renato Mello de PradoUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1998-6343
Douglas Furtado OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Chapadão do Sul, Brasil.
Cid Naudi Silva CamposUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Chapadão do Sul, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-885X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The compositional nutrient diagnosis-CND method is a standard tool for evaluating plant nutritional status. Adjustments are crucial to elevate accuracy. The effectiveness of such methodological refinements should be rigorously assessed through accuracy tests that are benchmarked against the prescient diagnostic analysis-PDA methodology. The objective of this investigation was to refine the CND technique for a more precise evaluation of N, P, and B nutrient status in cotton. The study's database encompasses 144 data points pertaining to crop yield and foliar nutrient concentrations from cotton plantations in the Cerrado biome of Brazil. Subsequently, the CND norms were established through rigorous calibration. Three separate nutrient-dose trials, each featuring four levels of N, P and B, were carried out to assess plant true nutritional status. Adjustments were made to the nutrient responsiveness range-NRr (0.5 and 1.0), while yield response-YR were scrutinized at threshold levels (5% and 10%). The prerequisites for achieving high diagnostic accuracy were nutrient specific. For N, maximal accuracy was linked only to the YR parameter (YR = 10%). For P, the most precise outcomes were attained with a NRr = 0.5 and YI = 5%. For B, highest diagnostic accuracy when the NRr = 1.0 and YI = 10%. These insights highlight the need to fine-tune the CND method for reliable nutritional evaluations and cotton crop productivity optimization.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGossypiumNitrogenBrazilPhosphorusNitrogenPhosphorusAccuracyCND methodDiagnostic analysisFoliar diagnosisGossypium hirsutumNet yield productivity

Identifiers

PMID39048661
PMCPMC11269722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.