ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Single Center Retrospective Evaluation of Coronary Artery Fistula Outcomes.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: A rare case of multi-vessel coronary artery-coronary sinus fistula combined with multiple coronary aneurysms initially presenting with frequent premature ventricular complexes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Transcatheter closure of a giant asymptomatic right coronary artery-to-left ventricular fistula in a 16-year-old female.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a paucity of literature describing long-term outcomes of patients with coronary artery fistula with most manuscripts focusing on those requiring interventions. We describe single-center outcomes of coronary artery fistulas including those not requiring intervention. We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical record and identified all patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery fistula over the last 10 years. 158 patients were identified with a coronary artery fistula. The mean age at diagnosis was 5.8 years (SD ± 5.9). There was a male (55%, n = 87) predominance. Concomitant congenital heart lesion was present in 49% (n = 77) and a genetic anomaly was found in 18% (n = 29). No ischemic changes on electrocardiogram or ECG-stress test were observed. The mean follow-up was 5.0 (SD ± 3.8) years. Most patients (94%, n = 149) did not undergo an intervention. Of those 63% (n = 94) had at least one follow-up echocardiogram. There was spontaneous coronary artery fistula closure in 44% (n = 41), 8% (n = 8) decreased in size, and 48% (n = 45) were unchanged. No patient had enlargement of the coronary artery fistula over time. Additionally, tiny and small coronary artery fistulas showed no significant clinical changes in coronary artery dimensions, left ventricle dimensions and function over time. Seven patients required intervention; two patients underwent surgical ligation and five underwent catheter-based intervention. Most patients with coronary artery fistula in our cohort did not require intervention and over half either closed spontaneously or decreased in size with routine follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39048635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.