ArticleScientific reports2024
Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose dual-input computed tomography perfusion in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary benign and malignant ground-glass nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malignancy in Ground-Glass Opacity Using Multivariate Regression and Deep Learning Models: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The diagnostic and prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography parameters in non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Hypoxia studies in non‑small cell lung cancer: Pathogenesis and clinical implications (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the value of low-dose dual-input computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules (GGO). A retrospective study was conducted in patients with GGO who underwent CTP in our hospital from January 2021 to October 2023. All nodules were confirmed via pathological analysis or disappeared during follow-up. Postprocessing analysis was conducted using the dual-input perfusion mode (pulmonary artery and bronchial artery) of the body perfusion software to measure the perfusion parameters of the pulmonary GGOs. A total of 101 patients with pulmonary GGOs were enrolled in this study, including 43 benign and 58 malignant nodules. The dose length product of the CTP (348 mGy.cm) was < 75% of the diagnostic reference level of the unenhanced chest CT (470 mGy.cm). The effective radiation dose was 4.872 mSV. The blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT), and flow extraction product (FEP) of malignant nodules were higher than those of the benign nodules (p < 0.05). The FEP had the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant nodules (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.821, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.735-0.908) followed by BV (AUV = 0.713, 95% CI 0.608-0.819), BF (AUC = 0.688, 95% CI 0.587-0.797), and MTT (AUC = 0.616, 95% CI 0.506-0.726). When the FEP was ≥ 19.12 mL/100 mL/min, the sensitivity was 91.5% and the specificity was 62.8%. To distinguish between benign nodules and malignant nodules, the AUC of the combination of BV and FEP was 0.816 (95% CI 0.728-0.903), whereas the AUC of the combination of BF, BV, MTT, and FEP was 0.814 (95% CI 0.729-0.900). Low-dose dual-input perfusion CT was extremely effective in distinguishing between benign from malignant pulmonary GGOs, with FEP exhibiting the highest diagnostic capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.