Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39048541›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A model-free method to learn multiple skills in parallel on modular robots.

Fuda van Diggelen, Nicolas Cambier, Eliseo Ferrante, A E Eiben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fuda van DiggelenDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands. fuda.van.diggelen@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-1649
Nicolas CambierDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1165-286X
Eliseo FerranteDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-8356
A E EibenDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-4213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legged robots are well-suited for deployment in unstructured environments but require a unique control scheme specific for their design. As controllers optimised in simulation do not transfer well to the real world (the infamous sim-to-real gap), methods enabling quick learning in the real world, without any assumptions on the specific robot model and its dynamics, are necessary. In this paper, we present a generic method based on Central Pattern Generators, that enables the acquisition of basic locomotion skills in parallel, through very few trials. The novelty of our approach, underpinned by a mathematical analysis of the controller model, is to search for good initial states, instead of optimising connection weights. Empirical validation in six different robot morphologies demonstrates that our method enables robots to learn primary locomotion skills in less than 15 minutes in the real world. In the end, we showcase our skills in a targeted locomotion experiment.

Identifiers

PMID39048541
PMCPMC11269725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.