ArticleEndocrine journal2024
Characteristic external genitalia in male neonates with 5α-reductase deficiency.
Article in Endocrine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been no reports comparing neonatal external genitalia of 5α-reductase deficiency (5αRD) with those of other 46,XY differences of sex differentiation (DSD). This study enrolled 31 Japanese cases of 46,XY DSD whose external genitalia was examined during the neonatal period; four were diagnosed as 5αRD and 15 were defined as non-5αRD by genetic analysis of SRD5A2 or urinary steroid metabolites. We compared the following characteristics between 5αRD and non-5αRD groups, adjusting the severity of undermasculinization of the external genitalia: stretched penile length (SPL), glans width, location of the external urethral opening, and proportion of undescended testis. The external genitalia of all the 5αRD cases were Quigley classification grade 2 or 3. We compared the phenotypes between the four 5αRD cases and 11 non-5αRD cases with grade 2 or 3. The median (range) of SPL in the 5αRD group (14 mm [11-16]) was significantly lower than that in the non-5αRD group (22 mm [15-29]) (p = 0.003). An SPL cut-off value of <15 mm yielded a sensitivity of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 7-93%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 72-100%) for discriminating between the groups. The median glans width, location of the external urethral opening, and proportion of undescended testis were not significantly different between the groups. The SPL of 5αRD in Quigley classification grade 2 or 3 was significantly shorter than that of other 46,XY DSDs with the equivalent grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.