GuidelineRespiratory care2024
AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Patient-Ventilator Assessment.
Guideline in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Waveform data capture substantial variation in tidal volume and other respiratory parameters.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- Positive end-expiratory pressure in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Impact of Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle-Based Quality Improvement on Head-of-Bed Elevation Compliance, Cuff Pressure Management and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Units: A Before-After Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Mechanical Ventilation vs. High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Airway hydration homeostasis in artificial airways: from mucus biophysics to monitoring and humidification strategies in critical care: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Invasive ventilator exhaust in critical care: aerosol transmission risks and management strategies-a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- The Effectiveness of 360-Degree Virtual Reality-Based Mechanical Ventilation Nursing Education for ICU Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Practice Guidelines: Phase 5 - New Methods Same Goals.Respiratory care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the important role of patient-ventilator assessments in ensuring the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation, a team of respiratory therapists and a librarian used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make the following recommendations: (1) We recommend assessment of plateau pressure to ensure lung-protective ventilator settings (strong recommendation, high certainty); (2) We recommend an assessment of tidal volume (V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.