ArticleUrology2024
Urinary Incontinence Care in the Academic and Safety-Net Primary Care Settings: Opportunities to Improve Quality of Care.
Article in Urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the quality of urinary incontinence (UI) care for women in the safety-net and nonsafety-net settings prior to referral to a specialist.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 200 women from two nonsafety-net hospitals and 188 women from two safety-net hospitals who were referred to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery specialists for bothersome UI between March 2017 and March 2020. We evaluated the care that women received 12 months prior to referral, by measuring adherence to a set of previously developed quality indicators (QIs), for example, the performance of a urinalysis or pelvic exam.
resultsWomen seen in safety-net hospitals were more likely to receive QI-compliant care than women in the nonsafety-net hospitals prior to referral, with 55.53% of appropriate care given in the safety-net vs 40.3% in the nonsafety-net setting (P <.01). Clinicians in the safety-net hospitals were more likely to adhere to QIs in patients with general, stress, and urgency incontinence.
conclusionWomen were more likely to receive timely, quality-based UI care in the safety net compared to the nonsafety-net setting. This may be in part due to aspects unique to the safety-net system, including an eConsult referral system, which guides referring clinicians in appropriate management steps that should be taken prior to the specialist visit, as well as women's health-focused primary care clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.