Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047787›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2024

[Impact of Non-Pharmacological Measures during COVID-19 Pandemic in Adolescents - A Cross-sectional Study of 649 10th Grade Pupils in the City of Witten, Germany (GeWIT-Study)].

Paul Wiesheu, Anne-Lisa Heye, Judith Tillmann, Nessia Rachma Dianti, Klaus Völkel, Klaus Weckbecker, Eva Münster

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul WiesheuInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Anne-Lisa HeyeInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Judith TillmannInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Nessia Rachma DiantiInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Klaus VölkelStabsstelle Arbeit, Gesundheitswirtschaft, Technologietransfer und Universitätsentwicklung, Stadt Witten, Witten, Germany.
Klaus WeckbeckerInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Eva MünsterInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung (IAMAG), Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin I und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and non-pharmacological interventions, with a particular focus on the subjective experiences of pupils in relation to the measures, the extent to which quarantine and illness with COVID-19 influenced their perception of the disease, the protective measures taken and the groups that were particularly affected.

methodsFrom November 2021 to February 2022, a written survey of tenth grade pupils from all nine secondary municipal schools in the city of Witten, Germany was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze and evaluate the data.

results98.3% of the pupils present in class (n=649) were included in the survey. Of the study population, 12.9% stated that they had already had COVID-19 and 43.6% had been quarantined. 27.3% of the pupils reported that mask-wearing was not easy for them, while 65.2% found wearing a mask easy. Furthermore, 33.4% reported that distance learning had negatively impacted their well-being, and 6.9% of the pupils reported that they had experienced more violence during the pandemic. Fear of COVID-19 was reported by 10% of the pupils, and was less frequently reported if pupils had already been infected with COVID-19 or had been quarantined. 75.7% reported no fear of COVID-19.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic and the non-pharmacological measures to address it presented significant challenges and were a substantial burden on the pupils. The present study shows that the pandemic and/or the measures had a negative impact on the pupils. It is imperative to critically examine the measures, particularly in relation to vulnerable groups such as gender-diverse or socio-economically disadvantaged pupils. Education that is needs-based and target group-oriented can facilitate increased acceptance and perceptions of safety of implemented measures among pupils.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsQuarantineStudentsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, DistanceFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMasksSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39047787
PMCPMC11626913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.