ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2024
Ornaments for efficient allele-specific expression estimation with bias correction.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The promise of long-read RNA-seq: reducing bias in analyses of allele imbalance.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PanGraphRNA: An efficient and flexible bioinformatics platform for graph pangenome-based RNA-seq data analysis.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics insights into plant genomic imprinting: approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation in Caenorhabditis elegans revealed by multi-strain allele-specific analysis.Genetics · 2025Article
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pseudoassembly of k-mers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CompMap: an allele-specific expression read counter based on competitive mapping.microPublication biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allele-specific expression plays a crucial role in unraveling various biological mechanisms, including genomic imprinting and gene expression controlled by cis-regulatory variants. However, existing methods for quantification from RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reads do not adequately and efficiently remove various allele-specific read mapping biases, such as reference bias arising from reads containing the alternative allele that do not map to the reference transcriptome or ambiguous mapping bias caused by reads containing the reference allele that map differently from reads containing the alternative allele. We present Ornaments, a computational tool for rapid and accurate estimation of allele-specific transcript expression at unphased heterozygous loci from RNA-seq reads while correcting for allele-specific read mapping biases. Ornaments removes reference bias by mapping reads to a personalized transcriptome and ambiguous mapping bias by probabilistically assigning reads to multiple transcripts and variant loci they map to. Ornaments is a lightweight extension of kallisto, a popular tool for fast RNA-seq quantification, that improves the efficiency and accuracy of WASP, a popular tool for bias correction in allele-specific read mapping. In experiments with simulated and human lymphoblastoid cell-line RNA-seq reads with the genomes of the 1000 Genomes Project, we demonstrate that Ornaments improves the accuracy of WASP and kallisto, is nearly as efficient as kallisto, and is an order of magnitude faster than WASP per sample, with the additional cost of constructing a personalized index for multiple samples. Additionally, we show that Ornaments finds imprinted transcripts with higher sensitivity than WASP, which detects imprinted signals only at gene level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.