Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047676›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2024

Outcomes following reoperative bariatric surgery following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a tertiary care centre.

Vitish Singla, Sukhda Monga, Arun Kumar, Tamoghna Ghosh, Bhanu Yadav, Mehul Gupta, Amardeep Kumar, Lokesh Kashyap, Vineet Ahuja, Sandeep Aggarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vitish SinglaDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sukhda MongaDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arun KumarDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tamoghna GhoshDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bhanu YadavDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mehul GuptaDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amardeep KumarDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lokesh KashyapDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vineet AhujaDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep AggarwalDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. Approximately 20%-30% of patients present with weight loss failure or reflux following SG, which might require reoperative surgery. We present the surgical outcomes and complications following reoperative bariatric surgery at a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS AND

methodsProspectively collected data of all patients undergoing reoperative bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2021 were analysed retrospectively. Weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and complications following reoperative surgery were evaluated.

resultsTwenty-six patients were included in the study. The mean age was 38.8 (10.8) years. The primary procedure performed was laparoscopic SG in all cases. Nine patients underwent Roux en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (one banded RYGB) and 14 underwent one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (three-banded OAGB). Three patients underwent resleeve. The most common indication was weight loss failure (65.3%). Fifteen patients were diagnosed to have hiatal hernia intraoperatively and concomitant repair was performed. The mean body mass index before revision surgery was 42.7 (9.8). It was 32.6 (5.7) kg/m2 and 33.0 (6.1) kg/m2 at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Age and pre-revision surgery excess weight correlated with weight loss (r = -0.79 and r = 0.99, respectively). Leak and bleeding occurred in one and two patients, respectively. There were two band-related complications and one 30-day mortality.

conclusionRe-operative bariatric surgery following SG has adequate weight loss with acceptable complication rates. Band placement in re-operative surgery might lead to a higher complication rate.

Identifiers

PMID39047676
PMCPMC11354943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.