Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047294›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Privacy preserving record linkage for public health action: opportunities and challenges.

Aditi Pathak, Laina Serrer, Daniela Zapata, Raymond King, Lisa B Mirel, Thomas Sukalac, Arunkumar Srinivasan, Patrick Baier, Meera Bhalla, Corinne David-Ferdon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aditi PathakAmerican Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-006X
Laina SerrerAmerican Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.
Daniela ZapataAmerican Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.
Raymond KingNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Lisa B MirelNational Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA 22314, United States.
Thomas SukalacCenter for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Arunkumar SrinivasanNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Patrick BaierAmerican Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.
Meera BhallaAmerican Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.
Corinne David-FerdonOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Steven LuxenbergOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Adi V GundlapalliOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.

Funding

CDC HHS HHSD2002013M53937B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand the landscape of privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL) applications in public health, assess estimates of PPRL accuracy and privacy, and evaluate factors for PPRL adoption. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature scan examined the accuracy, data privacy, and scalability of PPRL in public health. Twelve interviews with subject matter experts were conducted and coded using an inductive approach to identify factors related to PPRL adoption.

resultsPPRL has a high level of linkage quality and accuracy. PPRL linkage quality was comparable to that of clear text linkage methods (requiring direct personally identifiable information [PII]) for linkage across various settings and research questions. Accuracy of PPRL depended on several components, such as PPRL technique, and the proportion of missingness and errors in underlying data. Strategies to increase adoption include increasing understanding of PPRL, improving data owner buy-in, establishing governance structure and oversight, and developing a public health implementation strategy for PPRL. DISCUSSION: PPRL protects privacy by eliminating the need to share PII for linkage, but the accuracy and linkage quality depend on factors including the choice of PPRL technique and specific PII used to create encrypted identifiers. Large-scale implementations of PPRL linking millions of observations-including PCORnet, National Institutes for Health N3C, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 project have demonstrated the scalability of PPRL for public health applications.

conclusionsApplications of PPRL in public health have demonstrated their value for the public health community. Although gaps must be addressed before wide implementation, PPRL is a promising solution to data linkage challenges faced by the public health ecosystem.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityMedical Record LinkageElectronic Health RecordsHumansPublic Healthdata linkagePPRLprivacy-preserving record linkagepublic health

Identifiers

PMID39047294
PMCPMC11491627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.