Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047283›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Partisan Media, Trust, and Media Literacy: Regression Analysis of Predictors of COVID-19 Knowledge.

Kristy Roschke, Alexis M Koskan, Shalini Sivanandam, Jonathan Irby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristy RoschkeWalter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5134-9172
Alexis M KoskanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-1008
Shalini SivanandamCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5813-1787
Jonathan IrbyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7182-2587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was a devastating public health event that spurred an influx of misinformation. The increase in questionable health content was aided by the speed and scale of digital and social media and certain news agencies' and politicians' active dissemination of misinformation about the virus. The popularity of certain COVID-19 myths created confusion about effective health protocols and impacted trust in the health care and government sectors deployed to manage the pandemic.

objectiveThis study explored how people's information habits, their level of institutional trust, the news media outlets they consume and the technologies in which they access it, and their media literacy skills influenced their COVID-19 knowledge.

methodsWe administered a web-based survey using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to assess US adults' (n=1498) COVID-19 knowledge, media and news habits, media literacy skills, and trust in government and health-related institutions. The data were analyzed using a hierarchical linear regression to examine the association between trust, media literacy, news use, and COVID-19 knowledge.

resultsThe regression model of demographic variables, political affiliation, trust in institutions, media literacy, and the preference for watching Fox or CNN was statistically significant (R

conclusionsThis study suggests that the media outlets people turn to, their trust in institutions, and their perceived degree of agency to discern credible information can impact people's knowledge of COVID-19, which has potential implications for managing communication in other public health events.

Indexed as

controlCOVID-19health carehealth care professionalinstitutional trustmediamedia literacymisinformationnews consumptionpreventiontrust

Identifiers

PMID39047283
PMCPMC11306951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.