Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047238›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic drug monitoring2025

Limited Sampling Strategies Fail to Accurately Predict Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Impact of Enterohepatic Recirculation.

Moataz E Mohamed, Abdelrahman Saqr, Mahmoud Al-Kofahi, Guillaume Onyeaghala, Rory P Remmel, Christopher Staley, Casey R Dorr, Levi Teigen, Weihua Guan, Henry Madden and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04953715 (Microbiome and Immunosuppression), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04953715 active not recruitingnot on this map

Microbiome and Immunosuppression: The Mission Study

TypeobservationalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2020 to 2033Enrolled140ConditionsKidney Transplant Rejection, Kidney TransplantArmscollection of body microbiome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Moataz E MohamedDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7266-9980
Abdelrahman SaqrDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mahmoud Al-KofahiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Guillaume OnyeaghalaHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rory P RemmelDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Christopher StaleyDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Casey R DorrDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Levi TeigenDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Weihua GuanDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Henry MaddenDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Trials Office, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Julia MunozDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Trials Office, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Duy VoHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bryan SanchezHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rasha El-RifaiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and.
William S OettingDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Arthur J MatasDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ajay K IsraniHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pamala A JacobsonDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4145-7045

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
Gut Microbiota and Effect on Immune Suppressants in TransplantationR01AI140303 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI ISRANI, AJAY K, JACOBSON, PAMALA A · 2019 to 2024
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA) is challenging due to difficulties in measuring the area under the curve (AUC). Limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been developed for MPA therapeutic drug monitoring but come with risk of unacceptable performance. The authors hypothesized that the poor predictive performance of LSSs were due to the variability in MPA enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). This study is the first to evaluate LSSs models performance in the context of EHR.

methodsAdult kidney transplant recipients (n = 84) receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil underwent intensive MPA pharmacokinetic sampling. MPA AUC 0-12hr and EHR were determined. Published MPA LSSs in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus were evaluated for their predictive performance in estimating AUC 0-12hr in our full cohort and separately in individuals with high and low EHR.

resultsNone of the evaluated LSS models (n = 12) showed good precision or accuracy in predicting MPA AUC 0-12hr in the full cohort. In the high EHR group, models with late timepoints had better accuracy but low precision, except for 1 model with late timepoints at 6 and 10 hours postdose, which had marginally acceptable precision. For all models, the good guess of predicted AUC 0-12hr (±15% of observed AUC 0-12hr ) was highly variable (range, full cohort = 19%-61.9%; high EHR = 4.5%-65.9%; low EHR = 27.5%-62.5%).

conclusionsThe predictive performance of the LSS models varied according to EHR status. Timepoints ≥5 hours postdose in LSS models are essential to capture EHR. Models and strategies that incorporate EHR during development are required to accurately ascertain MPA exposure.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveDrug MonitoringImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMycophenolic AcidAdultAgedCohort StudiesEnterohepatic CirculationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTacrolimusTransplant RecipientsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID39047238
PMCPMC12818476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.