Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047143›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2024

Artificial Intelligence Methods and Models for Retro-Biosynthesis: A Scoping Review.

Guillaume Gricourt, Philippe Meyer, Thomas Duigou, Jean-Loup Faulon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. RC-GNN: A predictive model of enzyme-reaction pairs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume GricourtUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0143-5535
Philippe MeyerUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-2947
Thomas DuigouUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-2950
Jean-Loup FaulonUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-2953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrosynthesis aims to efficiently plan the synthesis of desirable chemicals by strategically breaking down molecules into readily available building block compounds. Having a long history in chemistry, retro-biosynthesis has also been used in the fields of biocatalysis and synthetic biology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is driving us toward new frontiers in synthesis planning and the exploration of chemical spaces, arriving at an opportune moment for promoting bioproduction that would better align with green chemistry, enhancing environmental practices. In this review, we summarize the recent advancements in the application of AI methods and models for retrosynthetic and retro-biosynthetic pathway design. These techniques can be based either on reaction templates or generative models and require scoring functions and planning strategies to navigate through the retrosynthetic graph of possibilities. We finally discuss limitations and promising research directions in this field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSynthetic BiologyBiocatalysisBiosynthetic Pathwaysartificial intelligenceretro-biosynthesisretrosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID39047143
PMCPMC11334239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.