Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047103›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Robust parahydrogen-induced polarization at high concentrations.

Laurynas Dagys, Martin C Korzeczek, Anna J Parker, James Eills, John W Blanchard, Christian Bengs, Malcolm H Levitt, Stephan Knecht, Ilai Schwartz, Martin B Plenio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biocompatible SABRE Hyperpolarization of [1-Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Translation of HyperpolarizedAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Live magnetic observation of parahydrogen hyperpolarization dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laurynas DagysNVision Imaging Technologies GmbH, Wolfgang-Paul Straße 2, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-6115
Martin C KorzeczekInstitut für Theoretische Physik and IQST, Albert-Einstein Allee 11, Universität Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-374X
Anna J ParkerNVision Imaging Technologies GmbH, Wolfgang-Paul Straße 2, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-2547
James EillsNVision Imaging Technologies GmbH, Wolfgang-Paul Straße 2, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-6860
John W BlanchardQuantum Technology Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1621-6637
Christian BengsSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Malcolm H LevittSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9878-1180
Stephan KnechtNVision Imaging Technologies GmbH, Wolfgang-Paul Straße 2, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8487-4324
Ilai SchwartzNVision Imaging Technologies GmbH, Wolfgang-Paul Straße 2, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-5621-859X
Martin B PlenioInstitut für Theoretische Physik and IQST, Albert-Einstein Allee 11, Universität Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-8843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) is a potent technique for generating target molecules with high nuclear spin polarization. The PHIP process involves a chemical reaction between parahydrogen and a target molecule, followed by the transformation of nuclear singlet spin order into magnetization of a designated target nucleus through magnetic field manipulations. Although the singlet-to-magnetization polarization transfer process works effectively at moderate concentrations, it is observed to become much less efficient at high molar polarization, defined as the product of polarization and concentration. This strong dependence on the molar polarization is attributed to interference due to the field produced by the sample magnetization during polarization transfer, which leads to complex dynamics and can severely affect the scalability of the technique. We address this challenge with a pulse sequence that suppresses the influence of the distant dipolar field, while simultaneously achieving singlet-to-magnetization polarization transfer to the desired target spins, free from restrictions on the molar polarization.

Identifiers

PMID39047103
PMCPMC11268409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.