Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047043›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Beta and theta oscillations track effort and previous reward in the human basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex during decision making.

Colin W Hoy, Coralie de Hemptinne, Sarah S Wang, Catherine J Harmer, Matthew A J Apps, Masud Husain, Philip A Starr, Simon Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Day-to-day fluctuations in motivation drive effort-based decision-making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cortico-striatal beta oscillations as a reward-related signal.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Colin W Hoy *Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-2544
Coralie de Hemptinne *Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-3666
Sarah S WangDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-9594
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-8335
Matthew A J AppsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-2202
Masud Husain *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-9255
Philip A Starr *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-4003
Simon Little *Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-6230

Funding

Uncovering the neurophysiology of motivation in Parkinson™s disease with implanted adaptive brain stimulationK23NS120037 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LITTLE, SIMON · 2021 to 2024
$809k
Identifying the neural mechanisms of goal-directed decision-making in Parkinson's disease using closed-loop deep brain stimulationF32MH132174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOY, COLIN · 2023 to 2025
$232k
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) F32MH132174HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) K23NS120037NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH132174NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS120037UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/R010668/2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (WT) 226645/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choosing whether to exert effort to obtain rewards is fundamental to human motivated behavior. However, the neural dynamics underlying the evaluation of reward and effort in humans is poorly understood. Here, we report an exploratory investigation into this with chronic intracranial recordings from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and basal ganglia (BG; subthalamic nuclei and globus pallidus) in people with Parkinson's disease performing a decision-making task with offers that varied in levels of reward and physical effort required. This revealed dissociable neural signatures of reward and effort, with BG beta (12 to 20 Hz) oscillations tracking effort on a single-trial basis and PFC theta (4 to 7 Hz) signaling previous trial reward, with no effects of net subjective value. Stimulation of PFC increased overall acceptance of offers and sensitivity to reward while decreasing the impact of effort on choices. This work uncovers oscillatory mechanisms that guide fundamental decisions to exert effort for reward across BG and PFC, supports a causal role of PFC for such choices, and seeds hypotheses for future studies.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaDecision MakingParkinson DiseasePrefrontal CortexRewardTheta RhythmAgedBeta RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddecision makingeffortmotivationParkinson’s diseasereward

Identifiers

PMID39047043
PMCPMC11295073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.