Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39047023›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Depression in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carmen Quesada-Puga, Gustavo R Cañadas, José Luis Gómez-Urquiza, Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera, Elena Ortega-Campos, José Luis Romero-Béjar, Guillermo A Cañadas-De la Fuente

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carmen Quesada-PugaUniversity Hospital Torrecardenas, Andalusian Health Service, Almería, Spain.
Gustavo R CañadasDepartment of Didactic of Mathematics, Faculty of Education Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
José Luis Gómez-UrquizaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Ceuta, Spain.
Raimundo Aguayo-EstremeraDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioral Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Elena Ortega-CamposDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
José Luis Romero-BéjarDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-9638
Guillermo A Cañadas-De la FuenteFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-3410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic meant a change in academic approach. This had an impact on the mental health of students, leading to, among other problems, depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence and factors that favoured the development of depression in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review with meta-analysis of prevalence was conducted in October 2023, using Pubmed, CINAHL and Scopus as the data sources used for the search. This review followed the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Search equation was: "(undergraduate nurses OR nursing students) AND depression AND (COVID-19 OR Sars-CoV-2)". The final set of articles was N = 12. Quantitative primary studies using anonymous scales and surveys to assess the prevalence of depression in nursing students in the last 3 years were included. Studies show a high prevalence of depression among young university students with figures above 50%. The total sample of students in the meta-analysis was n = 4,479 with a prevalence value of 32% (CI95% 22%-42%). Affected students are characterised by young, female students. Concerns included generalised academic uncertainty, social isolation, work overload, fear of contagion and concern about teaching delivery. Coping mechanisms were generally resilience, spiritual support, laughter therapy, seeking information about COVID-19 and eating food. In conclusion, students, especially female students, are at high risk of depression due to social isolation. In addition, coping techniques were inadequate and future strategies to prevent this situation should be considered.

Indexed as

COVID-19DepressionStudents, NursingFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39047023
PMCPMC11268638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.