Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046965›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Exploring the preferred integration approach for HIV, diabetes and hypertension care and associated barriers and facilitators in Central Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study.

Tiffany E Gooden, Mkhoi L Mkhoi, Lusajo J Mwalukunga, Mwajuma Mdoe, Elizabeth Senkoro, Stephen M Kibusi, G Neil Thomas, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Semira Manaseki-Holland, Sheila Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiffany E GoodenInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-5477
Mkhoi L MkhoiDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Lusajo J MwalukungaDepartment of Public Health, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Mwajuma MdoeDepartment of Public Health, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Elizabeth SenkoroIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Stephen M KibusiDepartment of Public Health, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-4068
G Neil ThomasInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-4114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely diagnosis and management of diabetes and hypertension among people living with HIV (PLWH) is imperative; however, many barriers exist within the current model of care for these comorbidities. We aimed to understand how HIV, diabetes, and hypertension care should be delivered and the associated barriers and facilitators for the preferred delivery approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 PLWH with comorbidities of diabetes and/or hypertension (referred to hereafter as non-communicable diseases [NCDs]), 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) that provide care for NCDs, and 10 HCPs that provide care for HIV. Participants were recruited from two healthcare facilities in Dodoma, Tanzania and interviewed in Swahili. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. We used the differentiated service delivery building blocks as a framework to determine where, who, what and when care should be provided. We applied the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to HCP transcripts to determine barriers and facilitators for the preferred integration approach. There was a consensus among participants that all care for NCDs should be provided for PLWH at HIV clinics (known as care and treatment centres [CTCs]) by either CTC doctors or NCD specialists. Participants preferred flexible follow-up care for NCDs and for it to be aligned with HIV follow-up appointments. The main barriers were mapped to the TDF domains of environmental context and resources, and social influences; the former included the lack of NCD medications, NCD diagnostic equipment, space, staff and guidelines whereas the latter included negative influences from peers and traditional healers. Several facilitators were mentioned regarding CTC HCPs' knowledge, skills, optimism and beliefs regarding their capabilities to care for PLWH with NCDs. The preferred integration approach should be tested, utilising the enabling factors described. The barriers described must be addressed with or without integration to achieve optimal care for PLWH with NCDs.

Identifiers

PMID39046965
PMCPMC11268702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.