Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046898›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Sex differences in discrimination behavior and orbitofrontal engagement during context-gated reward prediction.

Sophie Peterson, Amanda Maheras, Brenda Wu, Jose Chavira, Ronald Keiflin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie Peterson *Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Amanda Maheras *Department of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Brenda WuDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-8628
Jose ChaviraDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Ronald KeiflinDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-7337

Funding

University of California, Santa Barbara Academic Senate
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals, including humans, rely on contextual information to interpret ambiguous stimuli. Impaired context processing is a hallmark of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and addiction. While sex differences in the prevalence and manifestations of these disorders are well established, potential sex differences in context processing remain uncertain. Here, we examined sex differences in the contextual control over cue-evoked reward seeking and its neural correlates, in rats. Male and female rats were trained in a bidirectional occasion-setting preparation in which the validity of two auditory reward-predictive cues was informed by the presence, or absence, of a visual contextual feature (LIGHT: X+/DARK: X-/LIGHT: Y-/DARK: Y+). Females were significantly slower to acquire contextual control over cue-evoked reward seeking. However, once established, the contextual control over behavior was more robust in female rats; it showed less within-session variability (less influence of prior reward) and greater resistance to acute stress. This superior contextual control achieved by females was accompanied by an increased activation of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) compared to males. Critically, these behavioral and neural sex differences were specific to the contextual modulation process and not observed in simple, context-independent, reward prediction tasks. These results indicate a sex-biased trade-off between the speed of acquisition and the robustness of performance in the contextual modulation of cued reward seeking. The different distribution of sexes along the fast learning ↔ steady performance continuum might reflect different levels of engagement of the OFC, and might have implications for our understanding of sex differences in psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCuesDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleMalePrefrontal CortexRatsSex Factorscognitive controlcontextneuroscienceoccasion-settingorbitofrontal cortexPavlovian conditioningratsex differences

Identifiers

PMID39046898
PMCPMC11268887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.