Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046756›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

High Resolution Images of Human Meibum Spread on Saline.

P Ewen King-Smith, Carolyn G Begley, Richard J Braun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P Ewen King-SmithCollege of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Carolyn G BegleySchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States.
Richard J BraunDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding of the role of the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) in evaporative dry eye requires knowledge of its structure. X-ray studies show 11.1-nm thick lamellae in meibum at tear film temperature (approximately 35°C), whereas below 30°C, 4.88-nm thick lamellae predominate. Here, high resolution microscopy of meibum spread on saline is studied as a function of temperature, to compare with x-ray results. Methods: A purpose-built high resolution color microscope, previously used to study the TFLL, was used to study meibum from 10 subjects. It was spread on buffered saline at near 40°C, and allowed to cool to room temperature. Analytical methods from previous studies were applied to measure meibum and lamellar thickness. Results: Initially, an irregular "island" was formed, surrounded by a "background layer" of 7.8 ± 0.3 nm thickness. Dewetting of the meibum layer always occurred, leading to the formation of lens-shaped droplets. Below 30°C, the lenses start to emit "tails" having a multilamellar structure containing up to about 49 lamellae superimposed on the background layer, each lamella being 4.82 ± 0.13 nm thick. Conclusions: Below 30°C, meibum spread on saline shows a multilamellar structure like the 4.88 nm thickness in x-ray studies, demonstrating the ability to observe and measure tightly stacked lamellae. In contrast, above 30°C, the 11.1 nm lamellae were not observed as in x-ray studies, indicating that these lamellae were not tightly stacked but may be separated by disordered lipid. The role of these findings in evaporative dry eye is discussed.

Indexed as

Meibomian GlandsTearsAdultDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedSaline SolutionTemperatureSaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID39046756
PMCPMC11271807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.